Wednesday, 22 November 2017

Meme battles

I remember being semi-disgusted when I first came across the 'IT'S OK TO BE WHITE' meme. What a pathetic pusillanimous plea for tolerance in our own countries, the counties our ancestors built and passed on to us. But little did I know that in fact it represented a masterpiece of memeology. Its genius lay in its weakness because even with that it was sure to activate the hive of self-hating Whites and hostile minorities that infest every White country. This in turn would awaken normies to the prevailing double-standards as the more tame and inoffensive the message the more absurd the outcry surrounding it would be.  And by all accounts it's been a spectacular success.

But still, the very fact that Whites are reduced to such stratagems in our own countries, and that so many White cucks jumped at the bait underlines the extent to which our self-belief has fallen. Our big sin was colonialism for which we endlessly grovel and apologise. Be assured that no other race suffers from such an affliction. Mongolians for instance revere Genghis Khan who by many estimates killed 10% of the contemporary world's population. That would be about 500 million in today's figures. The one thing to make him happy was to 'see the bodies of my enemies piled up, hear the wailing of their wives and children and see their town and cities destroyed by fire'. Entire civilisations were destroyed and huge areas of the Eurasian landmass took centuries to recover,

Yet Genghis Khan is revered in Mongolia today. His monuments are everywhere. In fact there's a Genghis Khan Complex outside the capital Ulanbaator which is
dominated by a magnificent 120 foot tall equestrian statue of the mass murdering despot. Ironically Mongolians wistfully point out that the gradual demographic takeover of their country by Han Chinese would be reversed if the country had a latter-day Genghis.

Whites are in dire straights but one consolation is that we're winning the meme war against the soulless hectoring nation-wreckers who dominate every other arena. And as the great H L Mencken observed “one horse-laugh is worth ten-thousand syllogisms.”

Saturday, 18 November 2017

An astounding outcome

A little over two years ago Freddie Grey, a Baltimore criminal, died in the back of a police van. This lead to days of rioting which lead to many deaths and much of the city in ruins. The rioters were probably taking Mayor Stephanie-Rawlings-Blake at her word when she claimed they needed 'space to destroy' know, to assuage their grief at Freddie's death. She and her top law enforcement officials (seen in the top pic...clearly great legal minds, driven by a thirst for justice) came up with additional measures to get the city back on an even footing. 
Marlyn Mosby the State's Attorney (the epitome of the angry black affirmative action woman) immediately put the cops on trial and in the finest traditions of African justice virtually declared them guilty before they ever appeared in court. In fact all the cases against them collapsed.....opening the gates for more 'space to destroy'. Other measures included keeping police off the streets in 'sensitive' ( neighbourhoods and forcing White policemen to retire, to be replaced by corrupt and incompetent minorities who immediately realised that stopping crime in 'sensitive areas' would more likely lead to the police ending up in the dock than the criminals.

What could possibly go wrong? 

Well lots actually. The new Mayor is 'deeply concerned' by the ensuing crime rate. Murders are now at a record rate (more than 300 this year so far, Montana by contrast has had 37) but as one journalist noted 'much has been made of the staggering pace of killings in Baltimore. But less known are the increases in rapes, robberies, assaults, burglaries and arsons this year.'  By taking encouragement from the two-day 'ceasefires' (sic) arranged with the thugs the Mayor inadvertently revealed the city to be a war zone. Meanwhile Whites and businesses - same thing really - flee the city, further impairing the city's finances. So the city Administration now wants 'assistance' - which means White taxpayers picking up the tab yet again for the incompetence and depredations of the black undertow.

This is but the tip of the iceberg. Municipal pension funds are insolvent right across the country but self-evidently the worst are in minority-run areas. Take out the popcorn and enjoy the fun. They might yet make good on their threat to return to Africa if things turn out badly enough.

Wednesday, 15 November 2017

This sporting life

 I realise that few of you have much time for professional sport. It's understandable given that it represents the bread & circuses of modern times, serving to distract the White masses from the war being waged on them. In fact it's infinitely worse than a distraction, serving also as an extraordinarily effective weapon for breaking down our ethnic solidarity and normalising the presence of non-Whites in White society. It also segues perfectly into the Magic Negro syndrome, capitalising as it does on the one arena in which blacks excel.

Throughout Europe football and rugby teams used to reflect the tightly-knit communities they represented (dour Yorkshiremen, brawny Welsh miners, Protestant-only Scotsmen, Flash-Harry Londoners) and in doing so reinforced prevailing ethnic, religious and social bonds. The same applied at international level, blonde well-organised and predictable Swedes, ultra-talented but emotionally brittle French…..the national stereotypes generally held true. Now it's a matter of note when a 'local boy' plays for the local team and that French side (pictured below) contains but a small minority of actual Frenchmen. With the exception of eastern Europe “national” sides today are virtually interchangeable, a few Whites surrounded by various mystery meat of unfathomable origin. And – catastrophically - the fans have come to see this as normal.

Only this weekend a new Irishman took the field for  'his' country. Born and raised in the South Seas, in Ireland for all of three years, Bundi Aki is now authentically Irish. Or so most fans belief. The match he played in highlighted another calamity: The limitless capacity of blacks to destroy everything and anything that Whites built. In this case I'm referring to the South African rugby team (the Springboks). Throughout rugby history they bestrode the world like a colossus, building a legendary reputation for strength, organisation, passion, skill and innovative thinking. When Ireland played them a trouncing was expected, a close defeat represented something to be celebrated. And now? Ireland have been beating them routinely in recent years, culminating in a humiliating 38-3 win last Saturday. A couple of weeks earlier the Springboks were beaten by New Zealand with a stomach-churning scoreline of 57-0 .

What happened? Well, the Rainbow Nation happened. The Springboks had always been inextricably linked with the Afrikaner community, the occasional Anglo notwithstanding. But with 'freedom' the Bantus saw the opportunity for some of that fame and wealth that Whitey had unfairly kept from them. This of course was pure Cargo Cult thinking. Whites have something, we want it. No understanding of how and why the Springboks achieved such legendary status. They wanted 'their' share and they got it by insisting on quotas for non-Whites at both management and playing levels. The lunatics have taken over the asylum, lazy incompetent buffoons shoehorned into key positions….with predictable results.

The demise of the Springboks perfectly traces the demise of South Africa itself, and we must all face the grim possibility that similar fate could eventually befall Whites everywhere.

Monday, 13 November 2017

Viva Catalonia (y California) libre!

The Catalonian independence project seems to be in disarray, the leaders in flight or facing serious legal charges. What's the net impact on the NWO globalists' War On Whites? On the face of it any form of fissiparous movement should be supported as it runs directly counter to the World Government centralisation project.  If this Catalonia problem hastens the break-up of the E.U. then that is a good thing and we should support it. But there's an alternative take on this. Would the Empire be able more easily to control small and relatively weak member states than large unified ones? It could be argued that it is not the EU Evil empire that will fall to pieces, it is the small nations controlled by the EU.

Maybe, but the hostile reaction of the Brussels sociopaths to Catalonian independence suggests otherwise.

The other factor is that Catalonia is among the most (cough) 'liberal' and left-wing regions of Spain. Barcelona's Director Of Communications even took to pissing in the middle of the street to demonstrate her liberation. And the Catalans loved it. Despite their cities being ruined by the proliferation of African flotsam and blown up by Muslims they take pride in being pro immigration. An independent Catalonia would likely welcome in even more Muslims and Africans.

And being rich - for now anyway -  it will have no shortage of  parasites availing of this hospitality. The net result will be Detroitisation and an explosion (ha!) of terrorism. This from a 'Catalonian' imam. "Muslims should vote for pro-independence parties, as they need our votes. But what they do not know is that, once they allow us to vote, we will all vote for Islamic parties ... and as we begin to accumulate power in the Catalan autonomous region, Islam will begin to be implemented."

So hopefully independence will be achieved and the inevitable impoverished Islamicised miscegenated ghetto will serve as a warning to others. By the way I see the issue as being very similar to California's. Let them go too. Whites will leave and with a population comprised of mestizos, blacks and coolies - Third World peoples - it will revert in due course to Third World status. AND....the USA would be Whiter and stronger without it. 

Viva California y Catalonia libre!

Saturday, 11 November 2017

It's true after all. Diversity does stimulate innovation.

There was I thinking that diversity lead to societal decay, atomisation, distrust, incompetence, over-crowding, crime and violence. Well it does lead to all of those things but it seems it can also stimulate technical innovation. And that's a good thing. Sweden's Infrastructure Minister Tomas Eneroth hopes to introduce 'geo-fences' in urban areas next year using technology that can over-ride  drivers and digitally stop large vehicles or reduce their speed. 

Now those of you who've driven in Sweden might wonder about the need for such a technology given the legendary law-abiding qualities of that country's drivers.  But the Minister, although he of course hasn't pointed this out, has in mind the 'New Swedes', especially those adherents of  the Religion Of Peace. And specifically their unique approach to community relations involving mowing down the local kuffers with trucks and cars. 

I thought that the problem had been solved by turning pedestrian areas into replicas of Baghdad's Green Zone but apparently the jihadis had got around this by smashing very large vehicles into the barricades at very high speed. Hence the digital geo-fences. "Security on our pedestrianized streets has been improved. Directly after the terror attack we put out more stone lions, and we have also ordered heavier versions which are coming next year" said Daniel Halldén, Stockholm's transport commissioner. "The heavier lions will weigh three times as much as those currently in place, at three tonnes each, and will be placed in a way so that vehicles cannot drive straight ahead but are forced to turn, preventing them from being able to increase their speed."

Ah sure that's ok then. I'm sure all Swedes will agree that such inconveniences, and the regular sight of dismembered bodies on their streets, are but a small price to pay for the joys of diversity. 

Tuesday, 7 November 2017

Gun control: Some inconvenient truths

The latest shooting outrage - this time in Texas, getting hard to keep track - has elicited the usual hysterical squeals for gun control from the usual suspects. They cite such outrages as definitively supporting their position whereas in fact they do nothing of the sort.

Some inconvenient truths:

The ownership/murder ratio does not hold up. The ratio of gun ownership does not correlate at all with the number of murders. For instance Norway, Canada and Switzerland lag only slightly behind the USA in the gun ownership ratio but the gun death ratio (especially in Norway and Switzerland) is but a fraction of America's. 

Bad guys can always get hold a gun.  Would-be murderers or terrorists can always get hold a gun or if not a weapon equally lethal. This applies especially in the USA where existing circumstances (hundreds of millions of guns in existence and Latin America lying across a porous border) render it impossible to disarm gang-bangers or terrorists.

Gun deaths are actually declining: Despite the opportunistic hysteria that accompanies every mass killing in the USA the number of gun deaths there has actually declined since the nineties. (Last year 12 per 100,000, 15 for most of the nineties...a 20% decline). That being so why the clamour now? Read on.

The 80/20 rule: Analysis of race-delineated gun deaths shows that approximately 80% of White killers kill themselves while the ratio is reversed for black killers. We can reasonably infer that an absence of a gun would prevent a would-be suicide attempt.

Legally-owned gun-holders can deter attackers. We've seen this time and again, not least in the latest case where the assassin would have killed many more had he not been shot by a local man carrying a legally-held firearm.

The nigger in the woodpile: An appropriate metaphor here because the mystery ingredient underpinning all of the anomalies above is race. As FBI statistics show, year after year, blacks murder at about six times the rate of Whites, Hispanics three to four times the White rate. If you normalise the figures, i.e. isolate the ratio of gun murders committed by Whites, you'll see that America is little different from most European countries. In fact it's better than some.

It should be clear therefore - even to a sociology professor - that the whole gun control project is based on false assumptions, contradictory data and thus totally misdirected.  The measures proposed will be heavily skewed to disarm law-abiding Whites while making little or no impact in the overall gun murder rate. So it's totally misdirected and count-productive. 

Or is it? 

In this post I showed that the gun control project in America is absolutely dominated by Jewish interest groups, almost as much as with the open borders project. I go on to ask why Jews would be so hostile to private gun ownership. After all, they portray themselves - ad nauseam - as hapless hard-working victims of state-sponsored pogroms throughout history. But like so much of the Approved Version of History this trope doesn't stand up. In actual fact Jews have always managed to inveigle themselves into the role of eminence grise, at the side of or behind the actual rulers, as 'advisors', enablers, financiers etc. This role, so obvious in every Western country today, seems to have applied for centuries, even in Muslim regions. My own research into pogroms suggests that for the most part - there most certainly have been exceptions - but for the most part they've been spontaneous outbursts by the hoi polloi rather than organised Government action.

As an explanation for this apparent paradox I offer the experience of colonialism. Understand that every colonial power assigned top priority to disarming the colonised population. The British Empire expended enormous amounts of blood, treasure and a variety of tactics (carrots, sticks, deception) in separating the natives from their arms. Am I uncharitable in suggesting that Jews regard America as colonised territory, a territory in which their position relative to the general population is analogous to that of - for example - Whites in Kenya under colonialism? The nightmare scenario for the settler there was the prospect of being surrounded by well-armed Kikuyu or Masai tribesmen. Which explains why West Bank settlers are armed to the teeth day and night. (A practice with which Feinstein et al seem, strangely, to have no difficulty.) So maybe in the fevered imagination of Jewish gun control advocates White Christians represent the natives outside the compound poised to slit their throats at the first opportunity.

In that case if you are the Government doesn't it make sense for guns to be controlled by the Government?

Saturday, 4 November 2017

Colonial boundaries and their discontents

It's not often that I agree with left-wing libtards but I do when they claim that legacy colonial boundaries have given rise to many of the developing world's current problems. Because it is true that many such boundaries, especially in Africa and the Middle East, were drawn in straight lines with barely a nod in the direction of the underlying ethnic realities. Many of today's countries in those regions are now a hotch-potch of often incompatible ethnicities, races, religions and cultures.

Thus the Rwandan genocide has been squarely placed at the feet of the colonial power, Belgium in this case, which shoe-horned two mutually hostile people into the same small country, a disaster waiting to happen. Academic research bears out this analysis. "Our interpretation of this empirical result is that in societies where individuals differ from each other in both ethnicity and culture, social antagonism is greater, and political economy outcomes are worse.The study has found exactly this: societies that are both multiethnic/multiracial and multicultural have more social stress, antagonism, corruption, and low trust."

So that's pretty clear-cut. And indeed would be self-evident to anybody but a sociology professor. So why the fuck then are these same left-wing libtards trying to recreate the same catastrophic social conditions in White countries today? They actively work to import into what had been cohesive White societies millions of immigrants from races, religions and cultures that are incompatible not alone with White society but with one another as well. We know of course why their NWO globalist overlords are pushing this pernicious project: They want to destroy the ethnic homogeneity of the White race, their most dangerous opponent. But why would liberals (I use 'liberal' in its current deformed sense) want to do it?

Because liberalism truly is a mental disease.